Week three linkspam
Mar. 10th, 2014 10:02 am![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png)
Keri Russell (Elizabeth) did an interview with Collider about the second season.
Matthew Rhys (Philip) did an interview with Esquire about the second season and especially "Cardinal" (202).
The Americans gets a mention in this piece by Think Progress's Alyssa Rosenberg about why we keep having the same debates about prestige television dramas. (Rosenberg is one of the show's unapologetic critic cheerleaders.)
Bad news about the season two ratings: they slid between 201 and 202. But on the other hand, FX executive John Solberg tweeted that the show is up a ridiculous 94% in "time-shifted viewing" (that's up from an already very high 81% for the season premiere).
Another piece about the "spy training day" to which the show invited journalists has come out, this time by the UK's This Is Fakediy.
U.S. magazine Mother Jones has a piece about the Middle Eastern and Central American politics that form the backdrop for some of the plotlines for season two.
The critic at the Salt Lake Tribune who likes the show argues that Putin makes it harder to root for the two Soviet leads.
Some fans did some research into whether Raiders of the Lost Ark was actually still playing in early 1982, and apparently the writers did their homework.
Attention icon makers! screencapped.net has a treasure trove of high-quality images for you to work with, and here's another at grande-caps.net.
And finally, Keri Russell made a brief appearance on Jimmy Kimmel along with the infamous "Felicity wig" (video, just over 3 minutes).
Matthew Rhys (Philip) did an interview with Esquire about the second season and especially "Cardinal" (202).
The Americans gets a mention in this piece by Think Progress's Alyssa Rosenberg about why we keep having the same debates about prestige television dramas. (Rosenberg is one of the show's unapologetic critic cheerleaders.)
Bad news about the season two ratings: they slid between 201 and 202. But on the other hand, FX executive John Solberg tweeted that the show is up a ridiculous 94% in "time-shifted viewing" (that's up from an already very high 81% for the season premiere).
Another piece about the "spy training day" to which the show invited journalists has come out, this time by the UK's This Is Fakediy.
U.S. magazine Mother Jones has a piece about the Middle Eastern and Central American politics that form the backdrop for some of the plotlines for season two.
The critic at the Salt Lake Tribune who likes the show argues that Putin makes it harder to root for the two Soviet leads.
Some fans did some research into whether Raiders of the Lost Ark was actually still playing in early 1982, and apparently the writers did their homework.
Attention icon makers! screencapped.net has a treasure trove of high-quality images for you to work with, and here's another at grande-caps.net.
And finally, Keri Russell made a brief appearance on Jimmy Kimmel along with the infamous "Felicity wig" (video, just over 3 minutes).
no subject
Date: 2014-03-10 04:09 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2014-03-10 04:22 pm (UTC)-J
Ratings again
Date: 2014-03-10 08:04 pm (UTC)I have to say I'm encouraged not just by those numbers, but by an FX exec tweeting about them. :)
-J
Re: Ratings again
Date: 2014-03-10 09:37 pm (UTC)Re: Ratings again
Date: 2014-03-10 09:39 pm (UTC)-J
Re: Ratings again
Date: 2014-03-10 09:41 pm (UTC)Go go American viewers with the three-letter recording thingies!
Re: Ratings again
Date: 2014-03-10 09:55 pm (UTC)I think they also check +7 viewing.
Re: Ratings again
Date: 2014-03-11 01:15 am (UTC)Crossing fingers now for a third season. (And many more.)
Re: Ratings again
Date: 2014-03-11 03:53 am (UTC)I honestly don't know how much the PVR viewings count, because I think execs know that people aren't always watching the ads. But I think it must count for something, or else they wouldn't be measuring that.
-J
Re: Ratings again
Date: 2014-03-12 04:03 pm (UTC)Why people might dislike the show
Date: 2014-03-12 04:14 pm (UTC)The "hate" half of the one couple I personally know is of the "it's not escapist fantasy" sort--he tried the show for me but personally doesn't particularly enjoy shows that take place in our world. The hater half of the other couple (you and I have talked about this one) got as far as "COMINT" and quit watching because she loathed Philip so much. It's a hard show to sell to people on any generic level because there are so many different things that can push different kinds of people's buttons.
-J
Re: Why people might dislike the show
Date: 2014-03-12 04:53 pm (UTC)I think I was confused about somebody hating something because I was thinking I could understand not being interested in the show, but I wondered what somebody watching it would be being furious about. But it sounds like in that case it's just a case of "this show isn't for me" sort of thing rather than ranting. As opposed to the sexist thing, which to me, honestly, seems like kind of projecting something onto it because it accidentally looked similar to a second.
Re: Why people might dislike the show
Date: 2014-03-12 07:14 pm (UTC)Re: Ratings again
Date: 2014-03-12 04:27 pm (UTC)They do count, because broadcasters realize that people are moving to a 'watch when it's convenient' mode of watching. The Americans might be an extreme case, but for all shows, there's published ratings for +3 day and +7 day viewing.
As for skipping ads - the broadcasters are very much aware that the world is changing around them, and they need to figure out how to change with it. There was actually one show I remember posted all ads to YouTube, and people watched it for some reason. But there are other ways to solve this problem.
Re: Ratings again
Date: 2014-03-11 08:32 pm (UTC)Also as was mentioned below... may not appeal to the whole household. I'm certainly not watching this with my parents around! :P
Re: Ratings again
Date: 2014-03-11 08:57 pm (UTC)-J
no subject
Date: 2014-03-12 02:00 pm (UTC)-J
no subject
Date: 2014-03-12 07:16 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2014-03-12 07:18 pm (UTC)I was mostly looking it up to make sure I don't let myself worry too early this time. Like, we're definitely not going to get word of renewal until at least then this time around (and probably much later), so there's no sense in fretting about it yet.
-J
no subject
Date: 2014-03-10 04:24 pm (UTC)Sooner or later I've definitely got to do something with those goodies! ♥ Maybe an Elisabeth alter egos graphics with all her awesome wigs&disguises. ;)
no subject
Date: 2014-03-10 04:24 pm (UTC)-J
no subject
Date: 2014-03-10 04:27 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2014-03-10 04:32 pm (UTC)Sooner! Definitely sooner! :-)
no subject
Date: 2014-03-10 04:42 pm (UTC)Eheh, I'll see what I can come up with... ;)
no subject
Date: 2014-03-11 12:33 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2014-03-11 12:35 am (UTC)-J
no subject
Date: 2014-03-11 01:16 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2014-03-11 04:38 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2014-03-11 01:20 am (UTC)I also liked the little feature on Oleg's character FX posted today. It does seem like they're setting him up to be a love interest for Nina, or at least they probably wouldn't be working this hard to have her initially despise him at first if that wasn't the case :)
no subject
Date: 2014-03-12 04:15 pm (UTC)That makes me so happy too! I'm so glad the writers care about this sort of continuity; it makes it feel like one tight little world.
-J