Episode discussion post: "The Deal"
Mar. 26th, 2014 07:45 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png)
Aired:
26 March 2014 in the U.S. and Canada
30 March 2014 in Israel
12 April 2014 in the UK
This is a discussion post for episode 205 of The Americans, intended for viewers who are watching the show on the U.S./Canadian schedule. (Feel free to dive in to the discussion even if you're coming in late--and you should also feel free to start a new thread if it seems too daunting to read through what's already been posted first. If you're reading this at a point where you've already seen subsequent episodes, though, please take care to keep comments spoiler-free of anything that comes after season two, episode five.)
Original promo trailers
Episode recaps
From Grantland
From The New York Times
From Time
From Vulture
From The Washington Post
From Rolling Stone
From The AV Club
From Hitfix
From the Huffington Post
From Collider
From Sound on Sight
From IGN
From Television Without Pity
From TV Ate My Wardrobe
From Geekbinge
From showratings.tv
From screenrant.com
From GAMbIT Magazine
From Crave Online
From spoilertv.com
From tv.com
From Unreality Primetime
From Newsmanone
26 March 2014 in the U.S. and Canada
30 March 2014 in Israel
12 April 2014 in the UK
This is a discussion post for episode 205 of The Americans, intended for viewers who are watching the show on the U.S./Canadian schedule. (Feel free to dive in to the discussion even if you're coming in late--and you should also feel free to start a new thread if it seems too daunting to read through what's already been posted first. If you're reading this at a point where you've already seen subsequent episodes, though, please take care to keep comments spoiler-free of anything that comes after season two, episode five.)
Original promo trailers
Episode recaps
From Grantland
From The New York Times
From Time
From Vulture
From The Washington Post
From Rolling Stone
From The AV Club
From Hitfix
From the Huffington Post
From Collider
From Sound on Sight
From IGN
From Television Without Pity
From TV Ate My Wardrobe
From Geekbinge
From showratings.tv
From screenrant.com
From GAMbIT Magazine
From Crave Online
From spoilertv.com
From tv.com
From Unreality Primetime
From Newsmanone
Re: Sistermagpie's Thoughts on Rewatch: The Deal part 1
Date: 2014-03-28 06:43 am (UTC)I think it's Elizabeth.
* I wonder how that Columbia House code works. I mean, Elizabeth obviously gets specific info before heading to Martha's.
Me too. It's as if that was the "calm down Martha" code.
* It's like I read comments elsewhere last week about how Henry is sad and neglected
And he didn't even appear this time. He's probably still in his room, moping.
* So we never really learn the truth about Anton, if he was actually having an affair or knew who his girlfriend was and it was a cover. I assumed the affair was real, and a honeytrap, but others have said it's not for sure.
I also assumed it was real, but he seemed pretty trusting in the Mossad later on.
* Feeling silly, but I always thought "Russkie" was some straight American slur but when Arkady says it it seems like it's the actual Russian word for Russian? Or sounds like it?
Google has an answer for everything
"They both went for the gun, went for the gun, went for the gun"
Date: 2014-03-28 12:40 pm (UTC)Re: "They both went for the gun, went for the gun, went for the gun"
Date: 2014-03-28 02:11 pm (UTC)Re: "They both went for the gun, went for the gun, went for the gun"
Date: 2014-03-28 03:23 pm (UTC)Re: "They both went for the gun, went for the gun, went for the gun"
Date: 2014-03-28 04:32 pm (UTC)Re: "They both went for the gun, went for the gun, went for the gun"
Date: 2014-03-28 05:44 pm (UTC)Re: Sistermagpie's Thoughts on Rewatch: The Deal part 1
Date: 2014-03-28 05:00 pm (UTC)Is he moping, though? That's the thing that I think is so interesting, because parenthood has changed so much n teh past few decades that since the 90s any sight of a child who seems to be alone immediately reads as being despondent.
Now, on this show I think there are other signs that lead that way just in terms of the fact that we know the parents are being run ragged and at the same time the older kid is becoming a teenager and acting out so there's going to be times when she's sucking up attention that Henry might want. But in general Henry's not really hurting for parental attention as long as the parents are both living in the house. He was annoyed about the star chart, but that wasn't necessarily a silent, unheard rebuke of Philip for not being able to make a cheap comic book purchase actually work, you know? It's possible that Henry's main response to stuff going on is that Paige is being a pain more than Mom and Dad are too distracted to be good parents.
Henry
Date: 2014-03-28 05:42 pm (UTC)It's not as if he's missed, given what else goes on.
Re: Henry
Date: 2014-03-28 09:23 pm (UTC)That said, I do like Henry.
Re: Sistermagpie's Thoughts on Rewatch: The Deal part 1
Date: 2014-03-29 05:47 pm (UTC)No, I was joking :-) Though part of me can't help but wonder if he didn't just go off and disappear. I'll have to wait till the next ep to find out ;-)
Seriously, though: I do not think Henry is lacking for any parental attention. And since the episode focused more on what happened at night, I would expect his char to be in bed, sleeping.
Re: Sistermagpie's Thoughts on Rewatch: The Deal part 1
Date: 2014-03-29 07:04 pm (UTC)Re: Sistermagpie's Thoughts on Rewatch: The Deal part 1
Date: 2014-03-29 07:16 pm (UTC)Henry--at the end of The Walk-In
Date: 2014-03-29 11:29 pm (UTC)I'm thinking back to the montage at the end of "The Walk-In," to Peter Gabriel's "Here Comes the Flood." Philip's in the laundry room, busy developing those photographs he took of the propeller and the measurements. Paige is leaving the house without asking permission to visit the friend she made on her illicit bus trip. There was an image of Elizabeth holding baby Paige that looked like the picture on the wall at "Aunt Helen's". Henry's frustrated because he couldn't find the North Star--because his star chart was a crummy one that fell apart when he tried to make it work. The final image was Elizabeth smoking a cigarette while she watches the letter her friend wrote to give to her son in case of her death turn to ash. Ashes to ashes.
Yes, the single image of Henry getting frustrated with his star chart isn't so disturbing taken out of context. But the music, the rest of the imagery, combined with the symbolism of Henry trying and failing to locate the North Star--a fixed point in the sky that you can navigate by--if you can find it, makes me think we're suppose to feel not all is well with the Jennings family, including Paige and Henry.
Since the focus this season is supposed to be on the effect of the spying mission on their family, if the majority of viewers are concluding that everything is a-okay with Henry and that Paige is just a drama queen--and that does seem to be what most people think here--then there is has to be something going wrong with the scripts. This is obviously a minority view point, but I can't believe that's what the writers intended us to conclude.
Baby Paige
Date: 2014-03-29 11:45 pm (UTC)I actually compared the two in order to make a point about something, and it's not the same image at all. Which meant whatever point I was trying to make went out the window too..
But, yay show for putting in the effort!
Re: Henry--at the end of The Walk-In
Date: 2014-03-29 11:54 pm (UTC)Not at all. I think everybody gets that's there's something wrong with the Jennings family. I'm saying that what's wrong with the Jennings family isn't that it doesn't conform to an ideal of how parents are supposed to focus on their children by not having personal issues or having concerns outside their kids. The whole family is currently struggling to find the north star and failing, but in Henry's case it's the most literal because he's actually doing astronomy.
Attitudes about how parents are supposed to relate to children has changed really drastically in the past couple of decades, and I really do feel like part of the appeal of all these prestige dramas is they show parents having competing concerns and identities outside of being parents. Quite often those competing concerns damage the family or hurt the children--the Jennings are by definition an example of this because their children's entire existence is steeped in lies that could shake their entire identity. Or get them killed. That's central to the entire premise. But I think the automatic association with a solitary child disappointed in a comic book purchase or a teenager leaving the house to meet a friend without permission with the parents being busy is not one that people would immediately make in the not so distant past. Parents are assumed to have much more power and responsibility for their kids' emotional states now. A kid dealing with a personal crisis or disappointment on their own often reads as parental neglect where it wouldn't have in the past.
Re: Henry--at the end of The Walk-In
Date: 2014-03-30 12:51 am (UTC)I see. I was raising my kid beginning in the mid-eighties, so a little later than Philip and Elizabeth. I think I'm pretty clear about what constitutes actual neglect. For as long as I can remember, there have been people who made it their business to criticize the way other people raise their kids. It sounds that's been raised now to a whole new level.
Re: Henry--at the end of The Walk-In
Date: 2014-03-30 03:07 am (UTC)