Episode discussion post: "Cardinal"
Mar. 5th, 2014 07:45 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png)
Aired:
5 March 2014 in the U.S. and Canada
9 March 2014 in Israel
22 March 2014 in the UK
This is a discussion post for episode 202 of The Americans, intended for viewers who are watching the show on the U.S./Canadian schedule. (Feel free to dive in to the discussion if you're reading this later and have already seen subsequent episodes, but please take care to keep comments spoiler-free of anything that comes after season two, episode two.)
Original promo trailers
Episode recaps
From Vulture
From Hitfix
From The AV Club
From The Huffington Post
From IGN
From Think Progress
From SpoilerTV
From Zap2it
From Television Without Pity
From TV Ate My Wardrobe
From Filmthrasher
From showratings.tv
From Newsmanone
From Screenrant
From the LA Times
From Geekbinge
From tvrage.com
From Unreality TV (UK)
5 March 2014 in the U.S. and Canada
9 March 2014 in Israel
22 March 2014 in the UK
This is a discussion post for episode 202 of The Americans, intended for viewers who are watching the show on the U.S./Canadian schedule. (Feel free to dive in to the discussion if you're reading this later and have already seen subsequent episodes, but please take care to keep comments spoiler-free of anything that comes after season two, episode two.)
Original promo trailers
Episode recaps
From Vulture
From Hitfix
From The AV Club
From The Huffington Post
From IGN
From Think Progress
From SpoilerTV
From Zap2it
From Television Without Pity
From TV Ate My Wardrobe
From Filmthrasher
From showratings.tv
From Newsmanone
From Screenrant
From the LA Times
From Geekbinge
From tvrage.com
From Unreality TV (UK)
Re: be his girlfriend - Elizabeth and Gregory
Date: 2014-03-09 06:49 pm (UTC)Interesting question about Gregory. It's hard not to think there's multiple reasons there. Gregory's obviously very trusted. I'm not even clear how much Fred understands about what Emmett was--does he get that he was a Russian Illegal, even? Or does he just think he's working for the KGB?
Anyway, with Gregory Elizabeth obviously for personal reasons needed Gregory to know who she was because essentially that's what he was for her. He was a great agent professionally, but the thing he provided for her personally was a person to whom she shared all of her personal feelings about her job. So I think whatever reason she used to justify sharing all these things to him (and I'd like to know if she discussed it with Philip first, with justifications that would have had to have been at least somewhat lying), she needed it personally as a port in the storm. Did she reveal herself first and then start talking to him that way? I'd guess it was the opposite since even Gregory talks about how he felt like he "already knew" who she was before she told him. Of course he's speaking about his romantic past so he's not necessarily being brutally accurate there, but I think she probably had already started confiding her feelings to him, feeling that felt scary to her even if they didn't reveal her as Russian, and then she needed to tell him the whole story to really explain herself.
What Fred does and doesn't know
Date: 2014-03-09 06:53 pm (UTC)My impression is that he had no idea, which is interesting. And Philip seemed to pick up on that right off, because when Fred asked his "real name," Philip said "Emmett" without hesitation rather than saying "we're not supposed to talk about that," like he did later about his kids.
I'm also under the impression that Fred thought it was just Emmett who was a spy, and that Leanne was just an ordinary American woman raising a family. He seemed broken up by not just Emilia being murdered as an innocent, but Leanne, too.
-J
Re: What Fred does and doesn't know
Date: 2014-03-09 07:13 pm (UTC)I would think there's probably different ways that people become agents and different relationships they have that change what they know. I'm thinking about the "right wing" journalist guy, for instance. I could easily imagine him being more in the know about the Illegals program.
Re: be his girlfriend - Elizabeth and Gregory
Date: 2014-03-09 08:52 pm (UTC)I agree with you and Jae that she found a good reason to justify to herself why she revealed who she was to Gregory. I also agree that it's very probable that she really NEEDED it at the time. But now that I know them better, I think she did not follow protocol, and there were serious consequences to that.
Re: be his girlfriend - Elizabeth and Gregory
Date: 2014-03-09 09:24 pm (UTC)-J
Re: be his girlfriend - Elizabeth and Gregory
Date: 2014-03-09 09:37 pm (UTC)Anyway, to be heretical for a moment, I'm getting the feeling the writers didn't think this through.
Elizabeth's rule following exceptions
Date: 2014-03-09 10:35 pm (UTC)My interpretation of Elizabeth is not exactly the same as other people's... like I feel she tells herself she always follows the rules, and that's a strong motivator in her head, but in reality? She just doesn't always. She violated the rules to let Gregory go. She violated the rules to go after Zhukov's killer. Allowing Gregory to know her real name and to tell him personal details about her kids was a real risk. And it was a selfish thing to do because like you said, he easily could've been an FBI plant.
But this is Elizabeth. She did what she wanted to for personal reasons and found a way to twist it in her head so it fit. It's the same way Philip having a one-night stand with Irina is somehow so much worse than her decade long affair. She insists they have to follow all the rules, but she is the one writing all the rules--and gives a good deal of leeway for herself in how they are interpreted, while not allowing the same for others.
Re: Elizabeth's rule following exceptions
Date: 2014-03-09 11:07 pm (UTC)My read is that Elizabeth must have gotten permission to set this particular employer-employee relationship up in the way she did, and that Gregory would have received an extra-long period of vetting as a result. I certainly agree, though, that the reasons why she wanted it set up that way were entirely personal, and that she would have justified it to herself on the basis of something other than the personal.
-J
Re: Elizabeth's rule following exceptions
Date: 2014-03-09 11:31 pm (UTC)Re: Elizabeth's rule following exceptions
Date: 2014-03-10 04:04 am (UTC)Re: Elizabeth's rule following exceptions
Date: 2014-03-10 01:21 pm (UTC)The romantic relationship itself, though--that I could see being a violation of...something? Probably not official protocols, because it's not the sort of thing that could be forbidden in their jobs, really. Someone like Elizabeth HAS to be able to have sex with someone like Gregory (I mean, Philip is clearly not violating any sorts of protocols with Martha), so you can't outright forbid "fraternization" with someone lower down the totem pole like you can in other kinds of jobs, and I'm sure the KGB isn't naive enough about these things to have it as an actual written rule that their agents are not permitted to have certain kinds of feelings. Behaviours you can make rules about, feelings not so much.
But just the very fact that Claudia doesn't seem to know that they were lovers during "Only You" (my read is that she suspects but has never been told) suggests that Elizabeth had reason not to tell her. So that could be very easily read as Elizabeth having violated some unwritten rule (or at least an ideal) by getting her feelings involved.
-J
Re: be his girlfriend - Elizabeth and Gregory
Date: 2014-03-09 09:52 pm (UTC)Grannie knew the basic set up with Gregory in terms of him knowing who Philip and Elizabeth were and calling them by their real names, so it seems like she basically went through the official channels about it. I imagine the main thing she hid was her personal motivations. But she'd find a way to justify doing it professionally.
Re: be his girlfriend - Elizabeth and Gregory
Date: 2014-03-09 10:27 pm (UTC)