Jae (
jae) wrote in
theamericans2013-06-27 12:18 pm
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png)
Entry tags:
Episode discussion post: "COMINT"
Aired:
27 February 2013 in the U.S. and Canada
24 June 2013 in Australia
27 June 2013 in Ireland
29 June 2013 in the UK
This is a discussion post for episode #5 of The Americans, intended for viewers who are watching the show on the Australian/Irish/UK schedule. Please do dive in even if you've seen subsequent episodes, but take care to keep comments spoiler-free of anything that comes after season one, episode five.
FX's original promo trailer:
FX's official three-minute recap:
FX's official "Go Undercover" replay with commentary from the actors and producers:
New reviews/recaps:
From The Guardian (UK)
From Unreality Primetime (UK)
From Digital Spy (UK)
Reviews/recaps from first airing:
From Think Progress
From The AV Club
From Vulture
From Hitfix
From Collider
From Television Without Pity
From We Might Just Love TV More Than You
From
jessenigma at dreamwidth
From
jae at dreamwidth
27 February 2013 in the U.S. and Canada
24 June 2013 in Australia
27 June 2013 in Ireland
29 June 2013 in the UK
This is a discussion post for episode #5 of The Americans, intended for viewers who are watching the show on the Australian/Irish/UK schedule. Please do dive in even if you've seen subsequent episodes, but take care to keep comments spoiler-free of anything that comes after season one, episode five.
FX's original promo trailer:
FX's official three-minute recap:
FX's official "Go Undercover" replay with commentary from the actors and producers:
New reviews/recaps:
From The Guardian (UK)
From Unreality Primetime (UK)
From Digital Spy (UK)
Reviews/recaps from first airing:
From Think Progress
From The AV Club
From Vulture
From Hitfix
From Collider
From Television Without Pity
From We Might Just Love TV More Than You
From
![[dreamwidth.org profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
From
![[dreamwidth.org profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
no subject
The way I see it, Elizabeth wanted revenge, and Philip took it away from her by doing it himself. So, yes, it wasn't an issue of protection, and Philip showed he cared, but I do see it as more of a 'you touched my woman, prepare to die' kind of thing (and frankly, I think that storywise they had no choice, because they had to bring those two together *somehow*).
He does the same for his daughter. And so later, when he wants revenge on the guy who beat up his wife, he's doing the exact same thing he did in the Pilot. He's not saying that Elizabeth can't handle the guy and he's not really protecting her, because most chances are she's not going to see him again anyway. He just wants revenge.
no subject
Oh, it can totally be read that way, but SHE certainly didn't see it that way, given her reaction.
I think generally, his obsessively protective trait is a toxic thing between them, but that one time it worked for them because it also meant him simultaneously acknowledging that what she'd suffered was worth killing Timoshev over.
He just wants revenge.
That's what it looks like from inside of his head, but it's not how it looks to HER.
-J
no subject
-J
no subject
-J